Combined Influence of Strain and Heat Loss on Premixed Flame Stabilization

Combined Influence of Strain and Heat Loss on Premixed Flame Stabilization

Combined Influence of Strain and Heat Loss on Premixed Flame Stabilization

L. Tay-Wo-Chong, M. Zellhuber, T. Komarek, H. G. Im, W. Polifke

Flow, Turbulence and Combustion, 1-32, (2015)

L. Tay-Wo-Chong, M. Zellhuber, T. Komarek, H. G. Im, W. Polifke
Turbulent combustion, Premixed flame, Strain rate, Heat loss
2015


 

The present paper argues that the prediction of turbulent premixed flames under non-adiabatic conditions can be improved by considering the combined effects of strain and heat loss on reaction rates. The effect of strain in the presence of heat loss on the consumption speed of laminar premixed flames was quantified by calculations of asymmetric counterflow configurations (“fresh-to-burnt”) with detailed chemistry. Heat losses were introduced by setting the temperature of the incoming stream of products on the “burnt” side to values below those corresponding to adiabatic conditions. The consumption speed decreased in a roughly exponential manner with increasing strain rate, and this tendency became more pronounced in the presence of heat losses. An empirical relation in terms of Markstein number, Karlovitz Number and a non-dimensional heat loss parameter was proposed for the combined influence of strain and heat losses on the consumption speed. Combining this empirical relation with a presumed probability density function for strain in turbulent flows, an attenuation factor that accounts for the effect of strain and heat loss on the reaction rate in turbulent flows was deduced and implemented into a turbulent combustion model. URANS simulations of a premixed swirl burner were carried out and validated against flow field and OH chemiluminescence measurements. Introducing the effects of strain and heat loss into the combustion model, the flame topology observed experimentally was correctly reproduced, with good agreement between experiment and simulation for flow field and flame length.

DOI: 10.1007/s10494-015-9679-0